Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Socialism, Bureaucracy, and Farmers Branch, TX’s own Gabriel Rojas

Today was one of the most humiliating and infuriating days in my life.  I’ll give you more on that in a minute.

image The news of the day today, at least in the political-sphere, is a bit of what I’d consider to be biting political satire. All over Los Angeles, these posters depicting Barack Obama as the Joker from the Chris Nolan Batman movies are popping up (poster pictured to right).

The defensive line from the left has been saying that this is just a scare tactic to identify a two payer or single payer system with socialism (which is identified with communism, which is identified with extreme economic destitution and mass murder of it’s own citizens).

Inquisitr’s Kim LaCapria, a self-professed libertarian, analyzed the poster as such:

Meh. I appreciate good political commentary of any affiliation but this is just lazy. Protest fail. Are we supposed to be scared of socialism? Because last I checked, all my European friends and lovers have all their teeth left and don’t have to reset their own bones.

Personally, I don’t think socialized medicine needs much of a slamming.  If you’re in the know and understand the interdependencies of the various nations on the US military, it’s clear why it works in European countries – all the money they save not spending on a military (since ours supports and defends their nation), they can spend on healthcare. If they had to pay for both, they’d be as bankrupt as the United States will be.

But first, let me tell you about my no good, horrible, very bad day.

image  Beyond that, though, what I’m more fearful of isn’t socialism – it’s bureaucracy and increased governmental oversight. Ronald Reagan once said that “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I'm here to help.’” Never were truer words spoken, as I found out today.

This afternoon, I had the local cops called on me – for child abandonment. Given that my son, as most days (since I work from home) hasn’t left my line of sight for more than five minutes at a time all day, you may wonder how that’s possible.

My apartment is situated as such so that I can see what's going on in the living room from my back porch. Whenever I have a business-related call to take during the day, I usually plug my laptop up in the kitchen, which adjoins the back porch so I can get drinks and food for my two year old son Jacob Li when necessary, and to and step out on the back porch when I need quiet conversation.

Apparently today was the day that the city code inspectors picked to inspect my apartment. I’ve lived in Texas off an on for almost my entire life, and never once have any of my domiciles been subject to a surprise city-mandated code inspection before, but there is, I suppose, a first time for everything.

During today’s surprise inspection, I was on the phone on my back porch speaking with my partner at SiliconANGLE, John Furrier when I hear men's voices yelling loudly, as if they’re trying to get someone’s attention. I had been on the back porch for no more than a two or three minutes, and Jacob was thoroughly engrossed in an episode of Spongebob Squarepants, waffle in one hand and juice cup in the other. The way the sound bounces around in the courtyard behind my house, I thought it was coming from outside or from a neighbor. I looked around over the fences and such, and didn’t see anything, so I come back inside.

As I open the back door, I see two men I don't recognize standing in my living room, my front door open, and my son Jacob running out to the street.

I come in and they're yelling at me "Where have you been?"

imageI live in what I consider to be a safe neighborhood, but I also generally keep the door dead-bolted. Naturally, I’m a little alarmed that anyone would be in my house, let alone two disheveled looking workman types. Their very presence in my home (let alone their confrontation attitude and the fact that they’d just let my son run out towards the street) activated my daddy-instincts, and I began to size up the situation in my mind how I’d save my son and take out these two intruders.

I holler back as my 6’5” frame lumbers menacingly closes the distance across the household to their position: "Who the hell are you and what are you doing in my house?"

As it turned out, one of them was the local property maintenance fellow, and the other happened to be my ‘friendly’ neighborhood code inspector. The maintenance guy had supplied the city employee with my apartment key, and since I had failed to chain the door, they had gained entry into my home.

His answer to my inquiry was unimpressive.

“We've been in your house for a half hour trying to figure out why this kid has no parents around,” said the city man I later learned was named Gabriel Rojas.*

“That's bullshit, sir, I've been in the kitchen the whole time,” I replied.

“Watch your language with me," he said

imageDuring this interchange I'm carefully but steadily backing him out of the house - he's stepping backwards out and I'm advancing on him.

“What the fuck did you just say to me?" I ask, incredulously. At this point he’s backed himself all the way out of the house, and Jacob has long since run back in the house.

“I said watch your language with me,” said Gabriel. “I have a right to be here, announced or unannounced, and gain entry to your home for inspection under Texas state renter laws.  Check your leasing agreement.”

I was flabbergasted at the audacity of this man, who not only came into my house unannounced and started a verbal altercation with me, but told me that I essentially had signed my rights away by renting an apartment in the state of Texas. About half a dozen legal statutes raced through my mind that I could quote to refute him, but given that I was clearly dealing with a moron with a Napoleon complex, I didn’t imagine quoting them would do me much good.

He must have taken my brief pause as some sort of acquiescence, or perhaps the look of , because he pressed home his point: “You clearly don’t want to speak to me about your home inspection or why you were gone for a half hour, so you can talk to the cops.  I’ve already called the cops a half hour ago about your abandoned son, and they should be here soon.”

image 

I knew that the timeframe was made-up, since the police station is right across the street. If a cop were to walk to my house, it may take them four minutes. None-the-less, I locked the door, and Gabriel Rojas the City Code Inspector sat down on my front door stoop, and I awaited the arrival of the police.

The rest of the story is pretty unexciting.  Once the cops got here, I explained everything to them in vivid detail, more or less like I did above, adding only: "Look, the guy is probably saying I'm argumentative and confrontational, but from my perspective, there were two unknown disheveled men in my livingroom, my son's running out the front door... I went into protective dad mode.”

The cop said "I completely understand." With that, he and the three other squad cars that came to attend to my heinous crime took my number, wrote down my ID information, and left.

When my wife came home, she caught Gabriel in the parking lot, where he was similarly belligerent with her, informing her that if she didn’t like it, she could take it up with the Mayor of Farmer’s Branch, TX. Subsequent to the conversation with my wife, however, he recanted his previously ‘iron-clad’ timeline when speaking to our landlord.

The landlord, (whom I'm not really on great terms with) defended me to him, he admitted it was more like three minutes, rather than a half hour that he searched the household for my presence.

“Mr. Hopkins doesn’t have a car other than the one his wife drives,” the landlord told Gabriel. “Since he works from home, it would be impossible that he’d have left his child for a half-hour unattended.”

Socialism is really bureaucracy, and bureaucracy is really evil.

image To tie this intricate and detailed story of humiliation and frustration back into my original point – it was bureaucracy, regulation and ceding control to the government that gave this twit Gabriel Rojas the license to enter my house as if I were simply a squatter.  It is the position of control that attracted this little-man-syndrome having fellow to a position where he could not only bully his fellow man, but act as a busy-body in other’s affairs.

Bureaucracy and culturally shared cynicism is probably the biggest contributing factor to the overall level of frustration.  While I’m thankful that I won the police officer lottery this time around and didn’t get tased in front of my children, I’m also well aware of the fact that this passionately typed out blog post is about all the social justice that will be meted out.

Even though I knew it was futile, I still spent an hour on the phone with Gabriel’s direct superior at the city’s code enforcement division.  I learned a number of interesting but ultimately useless facts about the man: he’s had police training, he was a military policeman, he’s been in the department for some time… I heard some quieting platitudes and reiteration of the flawed ideology that code enforcement can visit their horrors on unsuspecting citizens at their whim.

We expect nothing of our government these days. Several years ago, when my wife and I were dating, over the course of a weekend, I had two direct encounters with law enforcement that more succinctly encapsulate the frustration I’m trying to convey (albeit packed with much less emotion).

I lived in Tyler, she in Dallas.  Over the two hour drive to see her, I was pulled over for traveling five miles in excess of the posted speed limit (of 65 MPH).  The conversation went cordially, if not bizarrely, enough for most of it.  Despite the fact that I was driving a late-model car in near-mint condition at the time, he thought I looked suspcious as I stood on the side of the road, and demanded to search my car. 

Since I had nothing to hide, I let him, but I made the mistake of putting my hands in my pocket while he searched, which spooked the young fellow. For my mistake, I spent the next hour handcuffed on the side of the highway while he turned my car inside out.

Later that weekend, while spending the night at a friend’s house, my car window was broken out and my radio stolen. As soon as I noticed it, I called the police, and then spent the rest of the day waiting for a patrolman to apparently never show up. The police couldn’t even be bothered to take a statement in person, and I was called and told to give a statement over the phone.  Curious at my situation, I asked the operator if they expected to catch the criminal in question.  She laughed and declined to answer.

Cynicism is great, but we’re systemically cynical to a fault…

image At what point do we as a country look around and realize we live in a world that doesn’t work?

No matter who I told the story of the city inspector to, everyone had the same reaction to my sentiment of resignation to no action being taken against Gabriel the Douchebag Code Inspector: “you’re right – nothing ever comes of these things anymore.”

This is the same system of control we wish to entrust our national health care to? Let’s leave aside the historical implications of the word ‘socialism’ for a moment.  Let’s set aside the modern examples of the many alternative forms of health care insurance, private and public, that exist as options for reform. Let’s put away our feelings of partisanship – this has nothing to do with Democrats or Republicans.

Let’s just examine our feelings and experiences with the government that we have.  When was the last time that government came through for you – on anything?  Have the police, over the course of your life, been a help or a hindrance to your financial and physical well-being? Are they more concerned with finding ways to curb vehicular petty crimes, or are they interested in keeping the peace?

Do you find that the many tentacled beast of local, state and federal government something that aids you, on the whole, with your goals in life? Are the people who fill those positions typically self-important loons who want to lord their small position of authority over you, or are they typically goodness-filled individuals with your best interests at heart?

You’re likely thinking to yourself of all the ways your government has failed you – not the big ways, but the death from a thousand cuts you suffer on a yearly basis.  The snotty DMV worker.  The inept TSA inspector.  The petty peace officer. The corrupt education administrators. The ineffectual congressional representative. The perversely moronic banking regulators.

At what point do we say “That’s enough?”

More importantly, at some point we need to say: “You get no more responsibility until you get the ones you have done and done right.”

---

Lest there be any confusion, the Gabriel Rojas in question is the Code Enforcement Officer in Farmers Branch Texas. He can be reached at gabriel.rojas@farmersbranch.info or on his phones: 972-919-1435. His direct superior, ‘Jim’, can be reached at 972-919-2549.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Occasionally, I Sound Intelligent [#twittergate]

I wrote a post finally commenting on the release of the hacked Twitter documents by Techcrunch over at SiliconANGLE on Friday.

John Furrier and I had a nice little back and forth in the comments over it.  Part of one of his comments said:

"There is no upside to the general public for selling stolen documents only danger of hurting people and their families whose stake (and life) is based upon the success or failure of Twitter (e.g. employees, partners, ..etc)."

The response I wrote wound up being blog length… so I’m making it a post here.

I think that point is debatable, based on your level of cynicism.

For instance, if you take the Rupert Murdoch approach to journalism, as long as there's a public interest in watching trainwrecks, then there's a public service being performed when you report on them. As most of the execs at FNC will tell you, Fox isn't a news network, it's an entertainment entity that's fueled by news and current events.

Pageview blogging, as well as most other forms of Heritage Media, the product isn't the news or the journalistic service being performed (even though it's been elevated in recent history to the level of "Fourth Estate" and put on a pedestal).

The product is the audience. The responsibility is to the advertisers. The way you buy that product in bulk to sell to the advertisers is by being sensational, unique, useful or interesting. The means really isn't important so long as the goal is accomplished.

Any other bits of journalistic ethics imposed on the editorial employees are just arbitrary hoops the company sets on itself for the purposes of making the journey to profitability more challenging (and in some cases, making what they print and produce more palatable to the product / audience).

Like I said, it's the cynical view held by most major news networks at the executive level. I don't know Mike Arrington's personal views on how he performs his job, and if he's that cynical or if there's another more altruistic agenda in place.

Whatever the case is, it's worth re-iterating that we don't fall into either category here at SA. We're not journalists, per se (though some of what we do might be considered an aspect of journalism), and we're not pageview driven and thus not beholden to treating our audience and community like a product.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Seven (Ostensibly) Smart Pundits. Seven (Decidely) Retarded Editorials [Google Chrome OS]

image I’m refraining from writing the title of this post until after I finish writing the post itself.  My original idea was to title it “The Five Most Retarded Google Chrome OS Headlines of the Day.” The problem is, everywhere I turn, there are more retarded editorials coming out every minute.

I’ve basically decided to stop surfing stories here and just go with what I have.  If I’ve missed an atrocious point of view, please feel free to add it in the comments.

Before you get on me about judging people’s editorials, let me quote a bit of Roger Ebert’s post from a couple days ago entitled ‘I'm a proud Brainiac’:

I am fond of the story I tell about Gene Siskel. When a so-called film critic defended a questionable review by saying, "after all, it's opinion," Gene told him: "There is a point when a personal opinion shades off into an error of fact. When you say 'The Valachi Papers' is a better film than 'The Godfather,' you are wrong." Quite true. We should respect differing opinions up to certain point, and then it's time for the wise to blow the whistle. Sir, not only do I differ with what you say, but I would certainly not fight to the death for your right to say it. Not me. You have to pick your fights.

[…]

Those who think "Transformers" is a great or even a good film are, may I tactfully suggest, not sufficiently evolved. Film by film, I hope they climb a personal ladder into the realm of better films, until their standards improve. Those people contain multitudes. They deserve films that refresh the parts others do not reach. They don't need to spend a lifetime with the water only up to their toes.

image With that in mind, I present to you here are some downright retarded opinions on Google Chrome OS:

Tom Krazit, step down from that blog

Mr. Schmidt, step down from that board – Tom Krazit | CNet
[Y]our position on Apple's board of directors now looks completely untenable given Google's intention to release a lightweight operating system for personal computers called Chrome OS.

[…]

It was pretty clear before, but now it's completely obvious: you are overseeing two companies on a collision course. How can you possibly claim that you're guiding the best interests of each company when the best interest of each company in two years will be to out-maneuver the other?

What’s wrong here?  Aside from the fact that Google isn’t competing with Apple with this impending release? How about the ridiculous poll that’s running aside the post (pictured above)?

The premise here lacks a basic understanding on how Apple distributes it’s operating system.  Here’s a hint – they don’t sell it at Best Buy as a standalone; to summarize my long post on this topic from the morning succinctly, chances are that the folks who want to pay $3000-5000 for a laptop aren’t concerned about price-point, which is what the Google Chrome OS is attacking.

Zee, you can step down too, if you want.

Prediction: Google and Apple go to War. – Zee | The Next Web
The move by Google is sure to leave Apple and Microsoft shaking in their boots, and quite frankly, I’m certain this is the beginning of the end for Ubuntu & co. What I’d like to focus on here however is Apple, a company which just weeks ago I couldn’t see myself ever abandoning, and who had convinced me that beauty, elegance and reliability were my top priorities when it came to an operating system.

I rather doubt that either Apple or Microsoft is shaking in their boots.  This is a purely theoretical operating system, at this point. Growing operating system market share isn’t done by word of mouth marketing, and assuming foolishly for just a minute that Google really is going after Apple and Microsoft, let’s engage our brains and think of how they’d go about that.

Apple users are on OS X because that’s what comes on their computer.  Very few, if any, install strait Linux or Vista, even though it’s possible, on their Apple machines.  Why?  Because Apple comes with OS X pre-installed. It’s a closed loop.

So if Google’s going to take out Apple, how do you imagine Eric Schmidt will convince Steve Jobs to go against his own company and put Google’s OS on the machine?

Here’s a hint: it isn’t happening, just as hordes of Apple-snobs won’t be turning in their Macbook badge of honor for a cheaply made netbook with Google Chrome OS running on it.

Techcrunch Drops the Ball, and It’s Made of MG

image Then, a guy who’s writing I like more and more every time I read it, Dennis Howlett over at ZDNet, points to the usual suspects and their breathless coverage of the topic:

Google Drops A Nuclear Bomb On Microsoft. And It’s Made of Chrome. – MG Siegler | Techcrunch
Wow. So you know all those whispers about a Google desktop operating system that never seem to go away? You thought they might with the launch of Android, Google’s mobile OS. But they persisted. And for good reason, because it’s real.

But let’s be clear on what this really is. This is Google dropping the mother of bombs on its chief rival, Microsoft. It even says as much in the first paragraph of its post, “However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web.” Yeah, who do you think they mean by that?

I shouldn’t be surprised at all that MG can’t help but nerdgasm all over himself at any opportunity to take Microsoft down a peg, but I thought my friend at least read my many articles on this topic in particular. I’m pretty sure we covered this on an episode of Elite Tech News that we were both on.

That’s exactly the whispers he’s talking about – Mike Arrington, right along the line down to Henry Blodgett told everyone on their very large soapboxes how Chrome was a play to outmode Windows.

Let’s re-iterate it one more time, just so we’re clear: Google Chrome, in it’s current state, is not a freaking operating system. It’s a web browser. There’s a world of difference, and dammit if you can’t tell you need to stop writing about tech until you can pass an A+ Certification Test. Here’s some remedial reading on this topic.

How hard is it to read the past posts on your own blog? Pretty hard, I guess.

BREAKING: Google to Launch Operating System – Ben Parr | Mashable
Clearly though, Google’s setting the stage for a major battle with Microsoft. Just as Microsoft is trying to break Google’s stranglehold on the search engine market, Google may be trying to do the same with the Windows-controlled market.

Really? That’s clear? From a press release on a blog post? I don’t remember reading that. Follow the money – why would Google go after Windows users, most of which already use Google and already click on their ads?  Isn’t it obvious they’re trying to break into a new market that Microsoft currently can’t penetrate?

OK, perhaps I’m being a bit harsh there.  Not everyone can be as perceptive as I am.  Not everyone has done their research like I have, and tried to remember back to quotes from Google personnel saying as much. Clearly not everyone can be as gifted as you and me.

Did you hear? Microsoft is about to go bankrupt! Bailout time!

Google goes after Windows with launch of Chrome OS – Sam Diaz | ZDNet
The Chrome OS is a direct attack against Microsoft’s lucrative - albeit vulnerable - Windows operating system.

So wait, suddenly the operating system with the largest marketshare on the planet is vulnerable?  If you say so, Sam.

image Can someone please check Dan Lyons’ credentials? Has he used a computer before?

Let's all take a deep breath and get some perspective – Fake Steve Jobs | Fakesteve.blogspot.com
Point four: You also may not have noticed, but nobody uses Chrome. I mean think about it. Do you know anyone who uses Chrome? Really? And you know why nobody uses Chrome? Because Chrome is shit. Just utter, utter shit. I mean they've got all these big brains at Google and you'd think they could make a decent fucking browser. Jesus, the freetards at Mozilla can do it. But not Google. Nope. They gave it their big best effort and what did they come up with? Chrome. It's a joke. I mean, literally, we laugh about it, except when Eric is around. But as soon as he leaves the room we all go "Chrome!" and just burst out laughing. Our guys on the Safari team even had special toilet paper made up with a Chrome logo on every sheet. That's how bad it is. Trying to make an OS out of Chrome is like saying you're going to turn a Pontiac Aztek into a stretch limousine. I suppose it could be done, but why?

That’s funny and all, but Dan Lyons is supposed to be smart when it comes to tech, and he’s missing one crucial fact – Chrome is Safari.  Incidentally, Dan’s a former technical analyst for Forbes, where he’s now a Senior Editor. 

Do any of you people think before you type?

Will Google's Chrome OS look rusty by late 2010? – Mary Jo Foley | ZDNet
However,  after reading the very few Chrome OS details that Google smartly dropped a couple of weeks before Microsoft is expected to announce the release to manufacturing of Windows 7, I’ve got a few doubts…. And quite a few more than the huge number of Google fanboys and girls who seem to forget for all its product debuts, Google hasn’t had any home runs other than search.

I’m having a hard time with this one. Not only has almost every blogger at ZD written on this topic today, they’ve almost all got a unique angle on the Chrome OS that involves making blatantly stupid statements.

Google hasn’t hit any home runs?  What is your definition of a home run?  How about video sharing site in the world?  That’d be Youtube.  How about most used blogging platform.  That’d be Blogger. Largest ad network? That’d be Adwords, followed by Doubleclick.

I could go on. Do I need to, or have I proven my point?

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Having a Blast Today at #WCDFW09

The show has been a blast so far – I’m sitting in the speaker’s lounge right now writing up a couple posts for release today and tomorrow, but I wanted to fire off a quick one to recap the day and point to the highlights so far.

image Liz Strauss did an awesome talk this morning as she dissected John P’s blog. John’s blog is particularly plain, but as he said, surprisingly popular.  Liz lead the live crowd-sourced suggestions of improvement to the site, and it came out particularly well. A lot of the changes couldn’t be implemented live, but John promised to make some changes tonight and show us the blog tomorrow.  If he changes his blog as rapidly as he changes his clothes, it should be done pretty quick (he’s gone through a surprising eight wardrobe changes throughout the day, including a Zoot Suite).

I enjoyed the talk from Cali this morning, and got some particular value from the talk Jonathon Bailey did on getting free content for your Wordpress blog.

image I was a little unsure on how my talk would go over – I hadn’t had a lot of time to go over my talk this week, and it’s the first time I’ve done the talk, but I’ve had quite a handful of folks come up to me and ask individual questions afterward, so I’d judge it a success.

All in all, most folks seem most interested in the list of ad networks and the blog ad network we’re working on at SALabs/theCBs, so definitely keep an eye on this blog and over at SiliconANGLE for more information on that.

Those of you who might be catching this from the hashtag in the Twitterstream or from a quick Google search on the talk, feel free to contact me via phone, email, Twitter or any other social network you can grab me by, and I’d be more than happy to answer questions or help you out with your blog monetization plans (or anything else you feel I might be able to offer salient advice on).

I’m Lazy – Here’s crowdsourced liveblogging [#wcdfw09].

Crowd-sourced liveblogging WordCamp Dallas 2009.  Click on through to watch.

WordCamp Dallas 2009 Starts Tomorrow #wcdfw09

image I’m mostly done tonight updating my talk for tomorrow (still hafta practice it in the mirror a couple times since it’s been a while since I spoke in front of a crowd).

Just to update, though, this looks like the event is completely sold out. This means you’ve missed out on the chance to capture the magic of me speaking to a horde of WordCamp aficionados live, but Cali Lewis will be streaming the event live at GeekBrief.TV.

I’ll be speaking, as you may know, on monetizing your blog in a world where AdSense does just about squat for most publishers. I’ll be updating the blog here and at SiliconANGLE more on that after the talk, but I wanted to take a bit and showcase a few of the others that will be speaking at WordCamp Dallas tomorrow and Sunday.

image Cali Lewis will be talking about what it takes to build a ‘vibrant community.’ As I mentioned earlier, you probably know Cali from GeekBrief.TV fame:

GeekBrief.TV is one of the world’s most popular video podcasts, with millions of downloads each month. During this lecture, Cali Lewis will discuss how she continues to build brand equity, drive traffic to her WordPress blog, and nurture her growing base of 46,000+ followers on Twitter.

image Liz Strauss will be talking about what it takes to bring more eyeballs to your website.  Liz and I go wayyy back to last year’s WordCamp.  She’s a really fun person to know, and I’m looking forward to talking to her and listening to her again.  Listening to her speak is a truly worthwhile experience, always. Here’s the gameplan for her talk:

Join Liz in a real-time blog intervention on John P’s blog. John will make the changes as Liz explains what makes a blog attractive, readable, irresistibly sticky.

Back in March, Liz and I sat down for a conversation in Austin.

image Of course, as always, founder of Automattic Matt Mullenweg will be there.  He’ll be doing a sort of “state of the Word” talk and a Q&A with the conference.

Matt and I chatted back on Mashable Conversations last year, and I hope to get a few minutes with him on camera this weekend (if you have any questions for him, leave them in the comments and I’ll see they get asked).

Monday, June 22, 2009

In Other Iranian Metacoverage [#iranElection]

image I’d also like to mention, while I’m irritated about the blogosphere’s short memory, the renewed attention that happened today regarding the Iranian Deep Packet Inspection issue.

It’s clear to most of us that the Iranian methods of censorship are not sophisticated. We all covered this last week when several very in depth articles on the topic came out (including several by me).

Somehow, when the Wall Street Journal says Nokia-Seimens is selling censorship technology to Iran, everyone believes it without researching or even remembering what they wrote three days earlier.

Infuriating, I tell you. Particularly when Slashdot draws attention to it, when that crowd should be particularly savvy to the fact that this isn’t what’s going on.

I wrote a comment there which got absolutely no traction, yet obviously should have:

Not surprisingly, the Wall Street Journal has this completely wrong.

The DPI software/hardware does *not* do the broadband filtration that the WSJ says it does. At SALabs, our R&D arm of the SiliconANGLE blog, we've done some pretty extensive research, and it's plain to us (and likely most of the IT audience here at Slashdot) that the type of censorship taking place in Iran is unsophisticated and isn't the result of DPI techniques.

We have several articles going into this matter on the site.
(http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5972) (http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5925) and (http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5919).

The bottom line is that this stuff is good old fashioned gateway blocking of addresses. The DPI software that Nokia sells is for mobile network packet shaping only, and not useful for censoring an entire country's information infrastructure.

Is everyone set straight now, though? 

Good.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

A Round-up of My #IranElection Coverage









Just because we’re coming to the end of the week on what’s been a hectic amount of information coming out of the #IranElection aftermath, and because my coverage is spread out across at least three sites, I thought I’d do a wrap-up of what I’ve written so far.

There are a few more coming this afternoon that I’ll append to this list, so be sure to check back, soon.

Update: Another update at SiliconANGLE from an IT angle this time…  How Iran is Blocking the Internet Suggests They Weren’t Prepared for an Election Backlash [#iranElection]

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

My #IranElection Coverage is Moving

image I’m going to continue to provide the same sort of posts I’ve been providing so far this week on the #IranElection goings on, but I’ve decided, with Duncan Riley’s permission, to move them to a larger audience.

I’ll be posting for the next several days (or weeks?) over at Inquisitr on the Iranian election aftermath as well as it’s impact on social media (and social media’s impact on it).

You can find all of that in Inquisitr’s News + Sport category.

Joining me on the coverage will be Paul Short and Duncan Riley, who are of course Inquisitr regulars, as well as updates from Kyle Lacey.

My first post went up a few minutes ago, and can be found here: Twitter IDs Aren’t Personally Identifiable Info [#IranElection].

#IranElection in Pictures









Searchme View in searchme: full | lite

I’ve got another flurry of #IranElection related posts coming today, but sometimes pictures speak louder than words.  You may have seen some of these pictures already, but watching them all together is mighty powerful. Take a few minutes and watch.

Monday, June 15, 2009

YouTube – Stop It Right Now #YouTubeFail [Iran]

image

I caught this tweet earlier tonight – I haven’t seen much confirmation on this other than anecdotal evidence on Twitter, but given that this is a recurring wheelhouse for me, I figured it’s worth bringing to bear my flashlight on the issue.

I’ve written almost dozens of editorials over the years concerning the very troubling track record YouTube and Google have with it’s terms of service and censorship policies.  Google seems to have gotten on the right track in recent months, but the YouTube division remains as troubled as ever.

I won’t re-hash my whole back-story here. Instead, here are a list of links you can browse at your leisure.

There are many others, but you get the idea – I’ve talked about this a lot.

image

If you do a Twitter search using the terms ‘youtube’ and ‘removed,’ you’ll come up with hundreds of tweets from folks who’ve ostensibly had their videos of the riots in Iran removed. This points to a larger pattern of removal, and based on what I’m reading, it seems to center around description and title keyword matches around words like “beating,” “death,” and “killed.”

There might be other terms, and if this is in fact the case as to why the videos are being so quickly removed, it’s a new tactic to me.

My educated guess is that one of several things could be happening (listed in no particular order):

  1. YouTube is caving to certain takedown requests from the Iranian government to avoid being blocked (or re-blocked) in the country.  I find this to not be a likely cause, but it wouldn’t surprise me based on past performances by Google (particularly in regard to the Egyptian-police brutality videos).
  2. YouTube is autoflagging these and taking them down due to specific “violent” keywords mentioned in the descriptions.  This, also, seems slightly unlikely, since much violent content already exists on the site (from video games to bum fights).
  3. YouTube’s anti-Sharia bury brigade’s at work. Remember when I severely chastised Google and YouTube to not heeding Lieberman’s demands to get Al-Qaeda operatives off YouTube?  Supposedly, Google obliged under duress, but apparently has since gotten lax in their duties. I received an invitation earlier this evening to join the “YouTube SMACKDOWN Corps.” It’s a group of self-appointed vigilantes that go and flag terrorist recruiting videos as “objectionable” to get them removed. I’m not sure how savvy this group is, and if they’ve caught Iranian protester videos in their net. When a video is flagged a few times, an age filter is put on it.  When it’s flagged enough, it’s removed pending review.
  4. The videos are being legitimately taken down due to violent content. Violent content is prohibited by the YouTube terms of service.  The enforcement of this is arbitrary and capricious, but since no effort to obfuscate the the violence in these videos is made (and they’re unbelievable violent – several show protesters beaten to death on camera), they could be getting taken down through legitimate means.

Whatever the reason is – as soon as word of this spreads, it’s going to be a major PR stain on YouTube’s record.  Up until this point, it’s been me and only a couple of other vocal editorialists in the tech blogosphere calling attention to YouTube’s ridiculous terms of service and censorship enforcement.

The bottom line is that YouTube needs to come up with a coherent policy, and enforceable policy, and stick to it. When it comes to infringing copyrighted material, they waste no time taking it down. When it comes to enforcing censorship and important videos under the terms of service in a way that makes sense, YouTube is all over the map.

That’s all I’ve ever said: just make some sense, YouTube.  Will this be the time you actually listen to me?

image

Update: It appears there’s a movement to mark the videos as “adult” so that when they’re flagged “objectionable” they aren’t removed completely. I’m not sure that this method works – is there any confirmation on this?

Sunday, June 14, 2009

#TwitterWin - #CNNFail

I’m on a live call with Michael Sean Wright (@nicefishfilms), Robert Scoble (@scobleizer), and Cyril Moutran (@mocy) right now, and we’re discussing Iran.

conversations with ? Along our curious path we have the occasion to converse with some really BIG thinkers. Thinking Out Loud is the raw stream from some of these encounters. On this SPECIAL edition: The trending issue today on Twitter is #CNN Fails. We're joined by Robert Scoble of Building43, Cyril Mutran co-founder of Twazzup and Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins to discuss the rise of real-time news. The lack of coverage by the US News Networks was just stunning and showed the complete failure of old media to cover breaking events like the real-time web. You can track the Iran Elections on Twazzup or wait a lifetime for tv news networks to catch up.

Download the discussion here.

image I’ll do a longer, more analytical post Monday morning (or Sunday night).  At this point, though, I’ll just give the bullet points and encourage you to listen to the show.

  • Robert talked about how this is a watershed event – CNN passing off the baton (involuntarily) to Twitter. CNN’s brand is irreparably damaged.
  • Cyril talked a bit about what he’s seen on Twitter so far.
  • Robert and Michael talked about the iconic image of the protests so far.
  • Cyril talked a bit about how Twazzup makes it’s judgments on what to display.
  • I discussed how it’s being theorized that Iran shut everything down in the media.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

I’ll Be Speaking at WordCamp Dallas 2009 [Help Me Out! - #wcdfw09]

image Just a quick update – I’ll have more on this for you folks this week.

I just got pinged by Cali Lewis for my speaker information, which I guess confirms that I’ll be talking at this year’s WordCamp Dallas.

I had been racking my brain for a topic for several months – speakers block? – and I finally came up with a topic that I think is going to suit most of the folks who attend.  Every blogger, when they’re not blogging for a corporate website that is, has gone through the hair-pulling and depressing experience of seeing that AdSense balance hover around pennies a day.

Recently, in conjunction with Steven and Sean at the Cynical Bastards and with John Furrier over at SiliconANGLE labs, I’ve been tackling this problem head on.  It’s been fun to bring some of my Mashable experience to bear on this issue, and the interest in our private little blog network has been growing beyond what I could have ever imagine (which was my first clue that this might be a hot topic to bring to the conference).

I’ve currently got a rough outline of what I want to tackle in my mind – flat sponsorship, identifying your audience, knowing your niche, remixing ad networks, and basic terminology. Here’s what I put in my talk description, just to give you a better idea:

Getting Beyond Google AdSense: How to Make Money With Your Blog
Contextual-based advertising is so last year! Google's AdSense is generally a good value for certain types of small business and product sellers on the Web, but has traditionally translated to little to no cash for the average ad-supported blogger. There are, fortunately, a world of unexplored networks our there, if utilized properly, that can greatly increase the return on pageviews for most bloggers. Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins will discuss some of his hard-won knowledge and try to answer questions based on his experiences monetizing blogs with 10,000 monthly pageviews up to millions.

image
I’m going to use you guys here in my audience to build my speech, so I want to get from you all your questions you may have about my experiences and discoveries. With that, I hope I’ll be able to better decide what’s important to include and what’s best to leave out.

So lend me a hand? Throw your thoughts and questions in the comments below.

Monday, June 8, 2009

One Cynical Bastard Speaks Out on Trolls [Arrington vs. Laporte]

Update: Michael Sean Wright sent me the follow-up broadcast that took place after the apology. Very interesting to listen to.

I completely missed out on the bitchmeme of the weekend, which apparently was a confrontation and apology between Mike Arrington and Leo Laporte that took place on the Gillmor Gang. I won’t analyze that much here – there was a pretty in depth post on it over at Techcrunch, Valleywag, Bwana, and on Friendfeed.

If you missed the whole debacle, there’s not much I can say that wouldn’t be better said in this video of the even.

The most amusing part is Kevin Marks (?) leaving just as it heats up.

In his response to the podcast’s abrupt end and in a followup from MG Siegler, the newest addition to the Techcrunch team, they both mentioned in some detail the great deal of trouble Techcrunch gets from their trolls.

From MG’s post:

I hadn’t really gotten to involved with it personally until I was working at VentureBeat, where as we grew in size, the trolls started coming out. Now that I’m with a site that gets even more traffic, TechCrunch, the situation is getting ridiculous. While still at VentureBeat, my usual approach to trolls was either to not respond, or to be a complete and utter jackass with the most sarcastic responses possible.

Unfortunately now, it’s gotten to the point where we simply have to moderate out comments. These aren’t just any old comments, they’re either completely out of line personal attacks, or straight up threats. While I have been threatened in comments both on VB and TC, I’ve never really felt any fear for my safety — they just make me mad. But as most people know, my current boss has. The situation is so ridiculous. We write news and opinions about technology. Technology. And that’s leading to threats. Absurd.

Several folks have said that there were over 600 comments moderated out of existence at Techcrunch, and the mob scene over at Friendfeed was supposedly so bad that it lead to them shutting down the account completely.

image There are two angles on this I want to address before moving on any further:

  1. On Techcrunch Trolls: There are quite a few people who don’t really believe that there are actual threats against Mike Arrington’s life, either in real life or to the extent he says they occur in online comments.  I personally don’t closely monitor things enough to form a personal opinion. I can’t say that they don’t occur at all, since he moderates them out of existence.  I do know examples of the type of stuff he’s moderated out of existence in the past – and from personal experience, I can tell you that it doesn’t need to be a negative comment at all.  If he doesn’t like you or the company you work for, your comments will be un-published.  I don’t begrudge him that, but I’m also saying that if you want to go down the rabbit hole of the state of trolling on Techcrunch – there’s a lot to it, and it’s not all one-sided.
  2. On Friendfeed Mob Mentality: That there’s a Friendfeed mob around something isn’t exactly surprising to me. Long time readers of my site will remember the great Rizzn racist-branding of 2008. Flash mobs occur around a lot of really stupid stuff on that site.  I’ve long since stopped trying to understand the ridiculousness of it all.  It happens, and deleting your Friendfeed account doesn’t stop it from happening, as I found out – it just stops you from seeing it.  Fortunately for me, at the time when I quit Friendfeed (before re-joining several months later), I was more interested in being shielded from stupid election-year debate, rather than not being talked about.  Michael’s decision was for the other reason – and I’ll say it was an ill-thought-out decision, since people will still talk about him and Techcrunch, they just won’t say it where he can see it.

I’d like to focus a little bit on why Mike Arrington and Techcrunch attract threats, if you buy into that storyline, which I do to a certain extent.

Before I do that, I’d like to stress that I in no way endorse any threats on anyone’s life, regardless of whether you side with Mike or Leo in this debacle.  It’s taking things too far, and it’s punishable by law if you get caught.

imageI’ve always been puzzled by the sort of negative attention Mike gets, though, in contrast with the sort of attention I generally get.  You see, unlike Mike, I’m generally at home with the fact that I’m occasionally an asshole.  My job, at Mashable, was to on occasion raise the trolls to get a little bit of excitement going in our comments area (in fact, we had a recurring “Mashable Troll” contest with actual prizes).

But there’s a certain method to the madness I executed in my occasional posting of troll-bait.  In general, most of my posts aren’t troll-bait.  I, like Mike, like to imagine that the bulk of my work has redeeming characteristics.  Sometimes I tried to push the envelope in my troll-bait and see how far I could go with an unpopular position before I got ridiculous push-back.

In general, though, I tried to have good humor to dull the edges of my harshest criticism, and more importantly, I crafted a body of work that showed my true intentions of not someone who simply wants to have a constant argument, but also likes to evangelize cool tech and extend a hand up to those looking to learn the ropes.

Michael Arrington and most of the Techcrunch crew don’t have this reputation.  Things like maintaining the deadpool and sometimes running with unverified stories at the top of their lungs have given them a reputation for being pageview hunters and muckrakers.  Certainly, their actions should speak louder than their words.  They’ve given a leg up to a lot of deserving (and sometimes, in my not-so-humble-opinion, undeserving) companies through their conferences, meetups and general coverage.

Despite this, he attracts a whole other level of troll that I tend to get.  Occasionally, I get my doozies – my favorite are the wingnut crowd. There’s nothing better than being called a proto-fascist or a neocon new media whore.

In general, I tend to spark engaged discussion or at least a good natured laugh when we go off the deep end. I’m not sure exactly why, but I think it has something to do with the fact that I’m just having a lot of fun with my work, and my intent is not to move markets. Even when I wrote at Mashable, and comments would range into the 80 to 120+ category, there were only one or two occasions when I had to delete comments (not for their threatening nature, but because I didn’t really care to have some of the content they linked to one click away from my post – things of an offensive, pornographic or racist nature).

Still, as any avid blogger will tell you, when a comment thread gets up into that range, it’s pretty difficult to manage regardless of whether the trolls have taken up residence. It’s difficult to manage not just as a site owner, but as a image reader. I’ve been toying about with a number of Wordpress plug-ins and I haven’t found exactly what I’m looking for, but ReadWriteWeb and Ars Technica have the closest implementation of what I’m talking about as a viable solution – converting the comment threads into a message board once they reach a certain threshold.

Beyond that, and more germane to MG’s concerns, hiring moderators either as full time or on the cheap isn’t a difficult proposition.  Often, in tight-knit communities, moderators work for free.  When they don’t, they can be outsourced cheaply to a Mechanical Turk-style situation – paying pennies for hordes of people to read comments and determine the level of offensiveness to the comments, and whether they should be pulled.

That, more than anything else, is what makes the claims of threat comments on Friendfeed or the Techcrunch site itself hardest to swallow – this is the company that came up with the Crunchpad, but they can’t come up with a viable crowd-sourced moderation solution for their bread and butter – the blog?

Friday, May 29, 2009

#Spymaster: Tips for the Twitter Game

“No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die.” – Auric Goldfinger

Update: If you’re here for the invite, add me on Twitter, and fill out the comment below. By adding me, I can DM it to you so I don’t hafta send the invite along the public timeline.

imageChances are, if you’re on Twitter this evening, you just got an invitation to go play Spymaster. If you haven’t gotten an invitation yet, just leave your Twitter address in the comments, and I’ll make sure you get an invite.

Currently the game is invitation only, but the invites are spreading like wildfire at the moment, so it’s not all that exclusive of a club.

If you haven’t wasted time before playing MySpace or Facebook Mafia-Wars / Mob-Wars style games, then how to effectively play may elude you at first.  In an effort to cash in on this soon-to-be craze, I figured I’d offer the benefit of my experience, since I’ve whiled away far too many hours on the dozens of other clones in this style of game.

There’s definitely a trick to playing this game.  There’s more than likely a number of ways to skin the cat, but I tend to play the same strategy because it generally works better than any other I’ve tried.

Fail Whale

My strategy overall is to focus first on getting the most experience for the least amount of energy spent, and then to focus strictly on maximizing profit through investments (or, as they’re called in this game, safehouses).

It sounds simple enough, but there are number of ways to get off track if you aren’t careful.

Game Basics
I’m going to more or less assume you grasp the basics of how the game works, if you’re reading this.  If not, a quick recap:

  • You’re a spy.  Either for the KGB, MI6 or CIA.
  • You’re supposed to do spy stuff, and you get paid for it as well as gain experience (tasks).
  • You apparently have a license to kill (assassinate).
  • You’re also an agency recruiter, responsible for convert spys (inviting to game).
  • Your boss is a cheap bastard, and you hafta buy your equipment on the black market.
  • You’re interested in buying (and what, sub-letting?) safehouses.
  • You keep your money in a Swiss Bank Account, because let’s face it, you don’t hear them asking congress for a bailout these days, do you?

imageThe overall goal is rather nebulous, but you’re motivated by not being too weak as a character, so that you’re not easy pickings for your enemies.

What You Actually Need to Pay Attention To
There are dozens of numbers and statistics that are thrown at you in games like this, and while they’re all generally fun to look at, they’re really only there to distract you from your goal, which is to be the richest and highest-level spy on the game.

Here are the stats in Spymaster to pay attention to:

  • Spymasters – these are people who follow you on Twitter that’ve joined the game.
  • Overall Funds – this is the amount of money you’ve racked up.
  • Energy per Turn – you can deduce this simply enough; whenever the “refresh in” counter reaches 0:00, take a look and see how much your energy level jumped by.
  • Maximum Energy – this gives you an idea as to how long you need to wait before you’re fully charged.  If you’re getting 25 energy every 5 minutes, and your max energy is 129, then you want to visit the game every half hour for maximum character advancement.

Why Are These Stats So Important?
What probably alerted you to the game were the assassination attempts you saw flash by on Twitter. Assassinations play an important role in any game like this, but if you want to survive long enough to win imageany of those attempts (or survive attempts perpetrated against you), you need to be well equipped.

What’s ironic is though it’s tempting to jump right in and start poppin’ caps into your friends’ Twitter accounts, if you want to actually win an assasination attempt once in a while, it’s the last thing you should start out doing.

Your First Steps to a Life of International Mystery
image Your first stop should be to perform as many tasks as you can to start so you can get some operating capital. I suggest for best efficiency at level one to do the task that requires 10 energy. You get the same experience for that as you do the higher energy task, and the money you gain at this level is negligible compared to what you’ll be pulling down later on.

After that, head straight over to the black market.  Remember that first number I told you to remember?  Your spymaster number is important here. Buy enough weapons and armor to cover everyone in your spymaster ring.  You can theoretically buy more than that and it will increase your defense and attack scores, but the there’s a diminishing return to that.

Now it’s time to play the waiting game: since you’re armed up fairly well, you can afford to take a break and come back after a while.

While you’re waiting, it’s a good idea to invite as many people to the game as you think you can get away with.  The real power in these sorts of games comes from having a lot of folks in your Spymasters group, since that (and your character level) are the biggest influencing factors on how easily you can be killed.

Your First Goal: Gain Level 3
Once you’ve come back to it, you want to get to level three as quickly as possible.  Assuming you’re not the impatient type and you didn’t take your turns every five minutes, so you’ve got nearly full energy right now.

Go ahead and perform the 10-energy task until you’ve run out of energy or attained level three, whichever comes first.

Your Second Goal: Get a Safehouse
Once you’ve attained level three, your goals change again, and this means you’ve got to change the way you approach your tasks.

Your goal now is no longer to get to as high of a level as possible, your goal is to get as much money as possible, and as quickly as you can. The reason here is that, as I said, the best asset you can have is a large Spymaster count.  The problem with that is you’ve got to provide guns and armor for every one of your Spymasters, which can get pretty expensive.

Just like in real life, rather than actually working for that money, the best way to keep that expense paid for is to invest.  I’m not sure the in-story reason that owning a safehouse is making you money (perhaps you’re subletting?), but owning real-estate, as in life, is generally a good  investment.

imageThe game assumes you can’t qualify for a sub-prime mortgage, and makes you pay for the safe-house up front.  This means you’ll need to come up with $80,000 to purchase the cheapest one you can find, a German condo.

The quickest way to get there, if you’ve followed these instructions so far, is to continue to perform the 10-energy task.  This may seem particularly counter-intuitive, and it is.  Here’s the explanation why:

If you’ve been performing the 10-energy task exclusively up until this point, you’ve likely gotten the proficiency of that task fairly high.  It’s a low risk task, which means it’s hard to fail anyway, but with a high proficiency, you’re almost guaranteeing yourself that you’ll receive compensation towards the higher end of the spectrum (the spectrum being $900 to $1,500).

On the other hand, you’ll waste a lot of turns and time failing while you learn the brand new level three 20-energy task.  The reward is higher, once you’re good at it ($2,100 - $3,500), but with your null proficiency, you’re guaranteed that you’ll recieve the low end of the compensation scale.

Thus two 10-energy turns will equal $~3000, whereas one 20-energy turn will probably equal closer to $2000.

Since your focus is solely money, the choice is clear.

Update: Since I’ve been playing the game today, I’ve noticed something that should have been obvious had I not been typing this long after my bed time.  Right around the time your proficiency in a task reaches 25-40%, your returns start diminishing significantly.  When this happens, you should switch up to the 20-energy task until you reach level 5.

Where to go from here?
Keeping in mind that I’m only a little bit less new to this version of the game than you are, I’ll give you the formulas I tend to work with, and let you adapt them as they work best for you.

image Once you’ve gotten your $80k condo in Germany, you need to spend some time crunching the numbers on the real-estate market.  Your first purchase will be netting you money even when you’re not playing the game, which will allow you to more easily purchase more real-estate and more equipment.

This allows you from this point forward in the game focus on taking tasks based on what will gain you experience, purely, while letting all the money from your real-estate investments roll over into future investments.  I played this strategy on the MySpace version of Mob Wars, and within a month, I literally had more money than the game would allow me to spend.

As of the time of this post, my character is almost level four, and I’ve almost got enough cash for my German condo. I’ve really only been playing it a little longer than I’ve been writing this blog post.

This is a pretty addictive and ultimately fun game in all it’s incarnations, and pairing it with Twitter was a stroke of genius.

If you’re interested in learning more about the company behind this game, you should check out my buddy MG Siegler’s write-up over at Techcrunch. If you’re looking for an invite to play, leave a comment here with your Twitter username.

Otherwise, just go out and play Spymaster.