Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Socialism, Bureaucracy, and Farmers Branch, TX’s own Gabriel Rojas

Today was one of the most humiliating and infuriating days in my life.  I’ll give you more on that in a minute.

image The news of the day today, at least in the political-sphere, is a bit of what I’d consider to be biting political satire. All over Los Angeles, these posters depicting Barack Obama as the Joker from the Chris Nolan Batman movies are popping up (poster pictured to right).

The defensive line from the left has been saying that this is just a scare tactic to identify a two payer or single payer system with socialism (which is identified with communism, which is identified with extreme economic destitution and mass murder of it’s own citizens).

Inquisitr’s Kim LaCapria, a self-professed libertarian, analyzed the poster as such:

Meh. I appreciate good political commentary of any affiliation but this is just lazy. Protest fail. Are we supposed to be scared of socialism? Because last I checked, all my European friends and lovers have all their teeth left and don’t have to reset their own bones.

Personally, I don’t think socialized medicine needs much of a slamming.  If you’re in the know and understand the interdependencies of the various nations on the US military, it’s clear why it works in European countries – all the money they save not spending on a military (since ours supports and defends their nation), they can spend on healthcare. If they had to pay for both, they’d be as bankrupt as the United States will be.

But first, let me tell you about my no good, horrible, very bad day.

image  Beyond that, though, what I’m more fearful of isn’t socialism – it’s bureaucracy and increased governmental oversight. Ronald Reagan once said that “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I'm here to help.’” Never were truer words spoken, as I found out today.

This afternoon, I had the local cops called on me – for child abandonment. Given that my son, as most days (since I work from home) hasn’t left my line of sight for more than five minutes at a time all day, you may wonder how that’s possible.

My apartment is situated as such so that I can see what's going on in the living room from my back porch. Whenever I have a business-related call to take during the day, I usually plug my laptop up in the kitchen, which adjoins the back porch so I can get drinks and food for my two year old son Jacob Li when necessary, and to and step out on the back porch when I need quiet conversation.

Apparently today was the day that the city code inspectors picked to inspect my apartment. I’ve lived in Texas off an on for almost my entire life, and never once have any of my domiciles been subject to a surprise city-mandated code inspection before, but there is, I suppose, a first time for everything.

During today’s surprise inspection, I was on the phone on my back porch speaking with my partner at SiliconANGLE, John Furrier when I hear men's voices yelling loudly, as if they’re trying to get someone’s attention. I had been on the back porch for no more than a two or three minutes, and Jacob was thoroughly engrossed in an episode of Spongebob Squarepants, waffle in one hand and juice cup in the other. The way the sound bounces around in the courtyard behind my house, I thought it was coming from outside or from a neighbor. I looked around over the fences and such, and didn’t see anything, so I come back inside.

As I open the back door, I see two men I don't recognize standing in my living room, my front door open, and my son Jacob running out to the street.

I come in and they're yelling at me "Where have you been?"

imageI live in what I consider to be a safe neighborhood, but I also generally keep the door dead-bolted. Naturally, I’m a little alarmed that anyone would be in my house, let alone two disheveled looking workman types. Their very presence in my home (let alone their confrontation attitude and the fact that they’d just let my son run out towards the street) activated my daddy-instincts, and I began to size up the situation in my mind how I’d save my son and take out these two intruders.

I holler back as my 6’5” frame lumbers menacingly closes the distance across the household to their position: "Who the hell are you and what are you doing in my house?"

As it turned out, one of them was the local property maintenance fellow, and the other happened to be my ‘friendly’ neighborhood code inspector. The maintenance guy had supplied the city employee with my apartment key, and since I had failed to chain the door, they had gained entry into my home.

His answer to my inquiry was unimpressive.

“We've been in your house for a half hour trying to figure out why this kid has no parents around,” said the city man I later learned was named Gabriel Rojas.*

“That's bullshit, sir, I've been in the kitchen the whole time,” I replied.

“Watch your language with me," he said

imageDuring this interchange I'm carefully but steadily backing him out of the house - he's stepping backwards out and I'm advancing on him.

“What the fuck did you just say to me?" I ask, incredulously. At this point he’s backed himself all the way out of the house, and Jacob has long since run back in the house.

“I said watch your language with me,” said Gabriel. “I have a right to be here, announced or unannounced, and gain entry to your home for inspection under Texas state renter laws.  Check your leasing agreement.”

I was flabbergasted at the audacity of this man, who not only came into my house unannounced and started a verbal altercation with me, but told me that I essentially had signed my rights away by renting an apartment in the state of Texas. About half a dozen legal statutes raced through my mind that I could quote to refute him, but given that I was clearly dealing with a moron with a Napoleon complex, I didn’t imagine quoting them would do me much good.

He must have taken my brief pause as some sort of acquiescence, or perhaps the look of , because he pressed home his point: “You clearly don’t want to speak to me about your home inspection or why you were gone for a half hour, so you can talk to the cops.  I’ve already called the cops a half hour ago about your abandoned son, and they should be here soon.”

image 

I knew that the timeframe was made-up, since the police station is right across the street. If a cop were to walk to my house, it may take them four minutes. None-the-less, I locked the door, and Gabriel Rojas the City Code Inspector sat down on my front door stoop, and I awaited the arrival of the police.

The rest of the story is pretty unexciting.  Once the cops got here, I explained everything to them in vivid detail, more or less like I did above, adding only: "Look, the guy is probably saying I'm argumentative and confrontational, but from my perspective, there were two unknown disheveled men in my livingroom, my son's running out the front door... I went into protective dad mode.”

The cop said "I completely understand." With that, he and the three other squad cars that came to attend to my heinous crime took my number, wrote down my ID information, and left.

When my wife came home, she caught Gabriel in the parking lot, where he was similarly belligerent with her, informing her that if she didn’t like it, she could take it up with the Mayor of Farmer’s Branch, TX. Subsequent to the conversation with my wife, however, he recanted his previously ‘iron-clad’ timeline when speaking to our landlord.

The landlord, (whom I'm not really on great terms with) defended me to him, he admitted it was more like three minutes, rather than a half hour that he searched the household for my presence.

“Mr. Hopkins doesn’t have a car other than the one his wife drives,” the landlord told Gabriel. “Since he works from home, it would be impossible that he’d have left his child for a half-hour unattended.”

Socialism is really bureaucracy, and bureaucracy is really evil.

image To tie this intricate and detailed story of humiliation and frustration back into my original point – it was bureaucracy, regulation and ceding control to the government that gave this twit Gabriel Rojas the license to enter my house as if I were simply a squatter.  It is the position of control that attracted this little-man-syndrome having fellow to a position where he could not only bully his fellow man, but act as a busy-body in other’s affairs.

Bureaucracy and culturally shared cynicism is probably the biggest contributing factor to the overall level of frustration.  While I’m thankful that I won the police officer lottery this time around and didn’t get tased in front of my children, I’m also well aware of the fact that this passionately typed out blog post is about all the social justice that will be meted out.

Even though I knew it was futile, I still spent an hour on the phone with Gabriel’s direct superior at the city’s code enforcement division.  I learned a number of interesting but ultimately useless facts about the man: he’s had police training, he was a military policeman, he’s been in the department for some time… I heard some quieting platitudes and reiteration of the flawed ideology that code enforcement can visit their horrors on unsuspecting citizens at their whim.

We expect nothing of our government these days. Several years ago, when my wife and I were dating, over the course of a weekend, I had two direct encounters with law enforcement that more succinctly encapsulate the frustration I’m trying to convey (albeit packed with much less emotion).

I lived in Tyler, she in Dallas.  Over the two hour drive to see her, I was pulled over for traveling five miles in excess of the posted speed limit (of 65 MPH).  The conversation went cordially, if not bizarrely, enough for most of it.  Despite the fact that I was driving a late-model car in near-mint condition at the time, he thought I looked suspcious as I stood on the side of the road, and demanded to search my car. 

Since I had nothing to hide, I let him, but I made the mistake of putting my hands in my pocket while he searched, which spooked the young fellow. For my mistake, I spent the next hour handcuffed on the side of the highway while he turned my car inside out.

Later that weekend, while spending the night at a friend’s house, my car window was broken out and my radio stolen. As soon as I noticed it, I called the police, and then spent the rest of the day waiting for a patrolman to apparently never show up. The police couldn’t even be bothered to take a statement in person, and I was called and told to give a statement over the phone.  Curious at my situation, I asked the operator if they expected to catch the criminal in question.  She laughed and declined to answer.

Cynicism is great, but we’re systemically cynical to a fault…

image At what point do we as a country look around and realize we live in a world that doesn’t work?

No matter who I told the story of the city inspector to, everyone had the same reaction to my sentiment of resignation to no action being taken against Gabriel the Douchebag Code Inspector: “you’re right – nothing ever comes of these things anymore.”

This is the same system of control we wish to entrust our national health care to? Let’s leave aside the historical implications of the word ‘socialism’ for a moment.  Let’s set aside the modern examples of the many alternative forms of health care insurance, private and public, that exist as options for reform. Let’s put away our feelings of partisanship – this has nothing to do with Democrats or Republicans.

Let’s just examine our feelings and experiences with the government that we have.  When was the last time that government came through for you – on anything?  Have the police, over the course of your life, been a help or a hindrance to your financial and physical well-being? Are they more concerned with finding ways to curb vehicular petty crimes, or are they interested in keeping the peace?

Do you find that the many tentacled beast of local, state and federal government something that aids you, on the whole, with your goals in life? Are the people who fill those positions typically self-important loons who want to lord their small position of authority over you, or are they typically goodness-filled individuals with your best interests at heart?

You’re likely thinking to yourself of all the ways your government has failed you – not the big ways, but the death from a thousand cuts you suffer on a yearly basis.  The snotty DMV worker.  The inept TSA inspector.  The petty peace officer. The corrupt education administrators. The ineffectual congressional representative. The perversely moronic banking regulators.

At what point do we say “That’s enough?”

More importantly, at some point we need to say: “You get no more responsibility until you get the ones you have done and done right.”

---

Lest there be any confusion, the Gabriel Rojas in question is the Code Enforcement Officer in Farmers Branch Texas. He can be reached at gabriel.rojas@farmersbranch.info or on his phones: 972-919-1435. His direct superior, ‘Jim’, can be reached at 972-919-2549.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Occasionally, I Sound Intelligent [#twittergate]

I wrote a post finally commenting on the release of the hacked Twitter documents by Techcrunch over at SiliconANGLE on Friday.

John Furrier and I had a nice little back and forth in the comments over it.  Part of one of his comments said:

"There is no upside to the general public for selling stolen documents only danger of hurting people and their families whose stake (and life) is based upon the success or failure of Twitter (e.g. employees, partners, ..etc)."

The response I wrote wound up being blog length… so I’m making it a post here.

I think that point is debatable, based on your level of cynicism.

For instance, if you take the Rupert Murdoch approach to journalism, as long as there's a public interest in watching trainwrecks, then there's a public service being performed when you report on them. As most of the execs at FNC will tell you, Fox isn't a news network, it's an entertainment entity that's fueled by news and current events.

Pageview blogging, as well as most other forms of Heritage Media, the product isn't the news or the journalistic service being performed (even though it's been elevated in recent history to the level of "Fourth Estate" and put on a pedestal).

The product is the audience. The responsibility is to the advertisers. The way you buy that product in bulk to sell to the advertisers is by being sensational, unique, useful or interesting. The means really isn't important so long as the goal is accomplished.

Any other bits of journalistic ethics imposed on the editorial employees are just arbitrary hoops the company sets on itself for the purposes of making the journey to profitability more challenging (and in some cases, making what they print and produce more palatable to the product / audience).

Like I said, it's the cynical view held by most major news networks at the executive level. I don't know Mike Arrington's personal views on how he performs his job, and if he's that cynical or if there's another more altruistic agenda in place.

Whatever the case is, it's worth re-iterating that we don't fall into either category here at SA. We're not journalists, per se (though some of what we do might be considered an aspect of journalism), and we're not pageview driven and thus not beholden to treating our audience and community like a product.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Seven (Ostensibly) Smart Pundits. Seven (Decidely) Retarded Editorials [Google Chrome OS]

image I’m refraining from writing the title of this post until after I finish writing the post itself.  My original idea was to title it “The Five Most Retarded Google Chrome OS Headlines of the Day.” The problem is, everywhere I turn, there are more retarded editorials coming out every minute.

I’ve basically decided to stop surfing stories here and just go with what I have.  If I’ve missed an atrocious point of view, please feel free to add it in the comments.

Before you get on me about judging people’s editorials, let me quote a bit of Roger Ebert’s post from a couple days ago entitled ‘I'm a proud Brainiac’:

I am fond of the story I tell about Gene Siskel. When a so-called film critic defended a questionable review by saying, "after all, it's opinion," Gene told him: "There is a point when a personal opinion shades off into an error of fact. When you say 'The Valachi Papers' is a better film than 'The Godfather,' you are wrong." Quite true. We should respect differing opinions up to certain point, and then it's time for the wise to blow the whistle. Sir, not only do I differ with what you say, but I would certainly not fight to the death for your right to say it. Not me. You have to pick your fights.

[…]

Those who think "Transformers" is a great or even a good film are, may I tactfully suggest, not sufficiently evolved. Film by film, I hope they climb a personal ladder into the realm of better films, until their standards improve. Those people contain multitudes. They deserve films that refresh the parts others do not reach. They don't need to spend a lifetime with the water only up to their toes.

image With that in mind, I present to you here are some downright retarded opinions on Google Chrome OS:

Tom Krazit, step down from that blog

Mr. Schmidt, step down from that board – Tom Krazit | CNet
[Y]our position on Apple's board of directors now looks completely untenable given Google's intention to release a lightweight operating system for personal computers called Chrome OS.

[…]

It was pretty clear before, but now it's completely obvious: you are overseeing two companies on a collision course. How can you possibly claim that you're guiding the best interests of each company when the best interest of each company in two years will be to out-maneuver the other?

What’s wrong here?  Aside from the fact that Google isn’t competing with Apple with this impending release? How about the ridiculous poll that’s running aside the post (pictured above)?

The premise here lacks a basic understanding on how Apple distributes it’s operating system.  Here’s a hint – they don’t sell it at Best Buy as a standalone; to summarize my long post on this topic from the morning succinctly, chances are that the folks who want to pay $3000-5000 for a laptop aren’t concerned about price-point, which is what the Google Chrome OS is attacking.

Zee, you can step down too, if you want.

Prediction: Google and Apple go to War. – Zee | The Next Web
The move by Google is sure to leave Apple and Microsoft shaking in their boots, and quite frankly, I’m certain this is the beginning of the end for Ubuntu & co. What I’d like to focus on here however is Apple, a company which just weeks ago I couldn’t see myself ever abandoning, and who had convinced me that beauty, elegance and reliability were my top priorities when it came to an operating system.

I rather doubt that either Apple or Microsoft is shaking in their boots.  This is a purely theoretical operating system, at this point. Growing operating system market share isn’t done by word of mouth marketing, and assuming foolishly for just a minute that Google really is going after Apple and Microsoft, let’s engage our brains and think of how they’d go about that.

Apple users are on OS X because that’s what comes on their computer.  Very few, if any, install strait Linux or Vista, even though it’s possible, on their Apple machines.  Why?  Because Apple comes with OS X pre-installed. It’s a closed loop.

So if Google’s going to take out Apple, how do you imagine Eric Schmidt will convince Steve Jobs to go against his own company and put Google’s OS on the machine?

Here’s a hint: it isn’t happening, just as hordes of Apple-snobs won’t be turning in their Macbook badge of honor for a cheaply made netbook with Google Chrome OS running on it.

Techcrunch Drops the Ball, and It’s Made of MG

image Then, a guy who’s writing I like more and more every time I read it, Dennis Howlett over at ZDNet, points to the usual suspects and their breathless coverage of the topic:

Google Drops A Nuclear Bomb On Microsoft. And It’s Made of Chrome. – MG Siegler | Techcrunch
Wow. So you know all those whispers about a Google desktop operating system that never seem to go away? You thought they might with the launch of Android, Google’s mobile OS. But they persisted. And for good reason, because it’s real.

But let’s be clear on what this really is. This is Google dropping the mother of bombs on its chief rival, Microsoft. It even says as much in the first paragraph of its post, “However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web.” Yeah, who do you think they mean by that?

I shouldn’t be surprised at all that MG can’t help but nerdgasm all over himself at any opportunity to take Microsoft down a peg, but I thought my friend at least read my many articles on this topic in particular. I’m pretty sure we covered this on an episode of Elite Tech News that we were both on.

That’s exactly the whispers he’s talking about – Mike Arrington, right along the line down to Henry Blodgett told everyone on their very large soapboxes how Chrome was a play to outmode Windows.

Let’s re-iterate it one more time, just so we’re clear: Google Chrome, in it’s current state, is not a freaking operating system. It’s a web browser. There’s a world of difference, and dammit if you can’t tell you need to stop writing about tech until you can pass an A+ Certification Test. Here’s some remedial reading on this topic.

How hard is it to read the past posts on your own blog? Pretty hard, I guess.

BREAKING: Google to Launch Operating System – Ben Parr | Mashable
Clearly though, Google’s setting the stage for a major battle with Microsoft. Just as Microsoft is trying to break Google’s stranglehold on the search engine market, Google may be trying to do the same with the Windows-controlled market.

Really? That’s clear? From a press release on a blog post? I don’t remember reading that. Follow the money – why would Google go after Windows users, most of which already use Google and already click on their ads?  Isn’t it obvious they’re trying to break into a new market that Microsoft currently can’t penetrate?

OK, perhaps I’m being a bit harsh there.  Not everyone can be as perceptive as I am.  Not everyone has done their research like I have, and tried to remember back to quotes from Google personnel saying as much. Clearly not everyone can be as gifted as you and me.

Did you hear? Microsoft is about to go bankrupt! Bailout time!

Google goes after Windows with launch of Chrome OS – Sam Diaz | ZDNet
The Chrome OS is a direct attack against Microsoft’s lucrative - albeit vulnerable - Windows operating system.

So wait, suddenly the operating system with the largest marketshare on the planet is vulnerable?  If you say so, Sam.

image Can someone please check Dan Lyons’ credentials? Has he used a computer before?

Let's all take a deep breath and get some perspective – Fake Steve Jobs | Fakesteve.blogspot.com
Point four: You also may not have noticed, but nobody uses Chrome. I mean think about it. Do you know anyone who uses Chrome? Really? And you know why nobody uses Chrome? Because Chrome is shit. Just utter, utter shit. I mean they've got all these big brains at Google and you'd think they could make a decent fucking browser. Jesus, the freetards at Mozilla can do it. But not Google. Nope. They gave it their big best effort and what did they come up with? Chrome. It's a joke. I mean, literally, we laugh about it, except when Eric is around. But as soon as he leaves the room we all go "Chrome!" and just burst out laughing. Our guys on the Safari team even had special toilet paper made up with a Chrome logo on every sheet. That's how bad it is. Trying to make an OS out of Chrome is like saying you're going to turn a Pontiac Aztek into a stretch limousine. I suppose it could be done, but why?

That’s funny and all, but Dan Lyons is supposed to be smart when it comes to tech, and he’s missing one crucial fact – Chrome is Safari.  Incidentally, Dan’s a former technical analyst for Forbes, where he’s now a Senior Editor. 

Do any of you people think before you type?

Will Google's Chrome OS look rusty by late 2010? – Mary Jo Foley | ZDNet
However,  after reading the very few Chrome OS details that Google smartly dropped a couple of weeks before Microsoft is expected to announce the release to manufacturing of Windows 7, I’ve got a few doubts…. And quite a few more than the huge number of Google fanboys and girls who seem to forget for all its product debuts, Google hasn’t had any home runs other than search.

I’m having a hard time with this one. Not only has almost every blogger at ZD written on this topic today, they’ve almost all got a unique angle on the Chrome OS that involves making blatantly stupid statements.

Google hasn’t hit any home runs?  What is your definition of a home run?  How about video sharing site in the world?  That’d be Youtube.  How about most used blogging platform.  That’d be Blogger. Largest ad network? That’d be Adwords, followed by Doubleclick.

I could go on. Do I need to, or have I proven my point?

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Having a Blast Today at #WCDFW09

The show has been a blast so far – I’m sitting in the speaker’s lounge right now writing up a couple posts for release today and tomorrow, but I wanted to fire off a quick one to recap the day and point to the highlights so far.

image Liz Strauss did an awesome talk this morning as she dissected John P’s blog. John’s blog is particularly plain, but as he said, surprisingly popular.  Liz lead the live crowd-sourced suggestions of improvement to the site, and it came out particularly well. A lot of the changes couldn’t be implemented live, but John promised to make some changes tonight and show us the blog tomorrow.  If he changes his blog as rapidly as he changes his clothes, it should be done pretty quick (he’s gone through a surprising eight wardrobe changes throughout the day, including a Zoot Suite).

I enjoyed the talk from Cali this morning, and got some particular value from the talk Jonathon Bailey did on getting free content for your Wordpress blog.

image I was a little unsure on how my talk would go over – I hadn’t had a lot of time to go over my talk this week, and it’s the first time I’ve done the talk, but I’ve had quite a handful of folks come up to me and ask individual questions afterward, so I’d judge it a success.

All in all, most folks seem most interested in the list of ad networks and the blog ad network we’re working on at SALabs/theCBs, so definitely keep an eye on this blog and over at SiliconANGLE for more information on that.

Those of you who might be catching this from the hashtag in the Twitterstream or from a quick Google search on the talk, feel free to contact me via phone, email, Twitter or any other social network you can grab me by, and I’d be more than happy to answer questions or help you out with your blog monetization plans (or anything else you feel I might be able to offer salient advice on).

I’m Lazy – Here’s crowdsourced liveblogging [#wcdfw09].

Crowd-sourced liveblogging WordCamp Dallas 2009.  Click on through to watch.

WordCamp Dallas 2009 Starts Tomorrow #wcdfw09

image I’m mostly done tonight updating my talk for tomorrow (still hafta practice it in the mirror a couple times since it’s been a while since I spoke in front of a crowd).

Just to update, though, this looks like the event is completely sold out. This means you’ve missed out on the chance to capture the magic of me speaking to a horde of WordCamp aficionados live, but Cali Lewis will be streaming the event live at GeekBrief.TV.

I’ll be speaking, as you may know, on monetizing your blog in a world where AdSense does just about squat for most publishers. I’ll be updating the blog here and at SiliconANGLE more on that after the talk, but I wanted to take a bit and showcase a few of the others that will be speaking at WordCamp Dallas tomorrow and Sunday.

image Cali Lewis will be talking about what it takes to build a ‘vibrant community.’ As I mentioned earlier, you probably know Cali from GeekBrief.TV fame:

GeekBrief.TV is one of the world’s most popular video podcasts, with millions of downloads each month. During this lecture, Cali Lewis will discuss how she continues to build brand equity, drive traffic to her WordPress blog, and nurture her growing base of 46,000+ followers on Twitter.

image Liz Strauss will be talking about what it takes to bring more eyeballs to your website.  Liz and I go wayyy back to last year’s WordCamp.  She’s a really fun person to know, and I’m looking forward to talking to her and listening to her again.  Listening to her speak is a truly worthwhile experience, always. Here’s the gameplan for her talk:

Join Liz in a real-time blog intervention on John P’s blog. John will make the changes as Liz explains what makes a blog attractive, readable, irresistibly sticky.

Back in March, Liz and I sat down for a conversation in Austin.

image Of course, as always, founder of Automattic Matt Mullenweg will be there.  He’ll be doing a sort of “state of the Word” talk and a Q&A with the conference.

Matt and I chatted back on Mashable Conversations last year, and I hope to get a few minutes with him on camera this weekend (if you have any questions for him, leave them in the comments and I’ll see they get asked).

Monday, June 22, 2009

In Other Iranian Metacoverage [#iranElection]

image I’d also like to mention, while I’m irritated about the blogosphere’s short memory, the renewed attention that happened today regarding the Iranian Deep Packet Inspection issue.

It’s clear to most of us that the Iranian methods of censorship are not sophisticated. We all covered this last week when several very in depth articles on the topic came out (including several by me).

Somehow, when the Wall Street Journal says Nokia-Seimens is selling censorship technology to Iran, everyone believes it without researching or even remembering what they wrote three days earlier.

Infuriating, I tell you. Particularly when Slashdot draws attention to it, when that crowd should be particularly savvy to the fact that this isn’t what’s going on.

I wrote a comment there which got absolutely no traction, yet obviously should have:

Not surprisingly, the Wall Street Journal has this completely wrong.

The DPI software/hardware does *not* do the broadband filtration that the WSJ says it does. At SALabs, our R&D arm of the SiliconANGLE blog, we've done some pretty extensive research, and it's plain to us (and likely most of the IT audience here at Slashdot) that the type of censorship taking place in Iran is unsophisticated and isn't the result of DPI techniques.

We have several articles going into this matter on the site.
(http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5972) (http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5925) and (http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5919).

The bottom line is that this stuff is good old fashioned gateway blocking of addresses. The DPI software that Nokia sells is for mobile network packet shaping only, and not useful for censoring an entire country's information infrastructure.

Is everyone set straight now, though? 

Good.